![]() Personally, I use DigiKam to organize / catalog / tag. Still, it would always be necessary to do a full scan of the entire library and build the training data for faces and object identification from scratch, but this would be totally unattended and automatic, take longer or shorter. This is essential, because if QuMagie could read (and interpret) the metadata of the images), thanks to the EXIF standards for facial regions, labels and others, not only the changes made by QuMagie would persist between different systems, but any software could read them without any problem, and more importantly !! On the contrary also, one could load his entire collection already tagged with any other software and QuMagie perfectly interpret people and others. To give an example, but not exclusively, facial regions (and labeling) Nowadays, the metadata of the images allows practically any type of characteristics to be added to them. Above all, and this links with the second problem, when a large amount of Software does not make the changes in the metadata of the images, but in a DB or independent files, as it does for example GPhotos, QuMagie, Synology. ![]() QuMagie works generally well, but cannot compete with applications that have been in the market for many years maturing. There is a multitude of infinitely more efficient and faster software for this. Using a NAS's own Software (whatever it is) to sort / tag tens of thousands of photos is nonsense. ![]() The main problem here is divided into two parts, one part is the fault of the user, another part of QNAP for not posing it in a much more efficient and intelligent way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |